Ilayer research
AI that reviews code the way an adversary would
A tool that cries wolf costs more time than it saves. We built a system of several AI agents. It audits smart contracts, the code that moves money on a blockchain. It attacks its own findings, and shows a person only what survives. It has found real vulnerabilities on live protocols.

The situation
- Automated audit tools bury a reviewer in false positives.
- One model is not enough. Different models miss different bugs.
What we built
- Several models run against the same target and cross-check each other's findings.
- Independent agents attack each finding, trying to disprove it. Only survivors ship.
Measured
What this system holds
7-gateEvery finding filtered before a human sees itSeven checks every candidate finding has to clear before a person sees it.Our own system, not a client's. The checks filter findings out; they do not prove one is exploitable.
LiveReal bugs on live protocolsHigh and medium findings on audited DeFi protocols.Protocol names withheld by choice. Severity labels are the platforms' own.
709Commits, and it is still being built709 commits into the pipeline behind these findings, and the seven gates are part of that count.Our own repository. It measures how much has been built, not how much it found.
What held
- We attack our own results the same way on every project we build.
The stack
- Multi-agent orchestration
- Rust TUI
- Next.js
- SQLite
- Solidity

